Original Paper
Why do so few low- and middle-income children attend a grammar school? New evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study
John Jerrim,
Sam Sims,
Corresponding Author
John Jerrim
UCL Institute of Education, London, UK
Corresponding author. Department of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK. Email: [email protected]; Twitter: @JohnPeterJerrim.Search for more papers by this authorJohn Jerrim,
Sam Sims,
Corresponding Author
John Jerrim
UCL Institute of Education, London, UK
Corresponding author. Department of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK. Email: [email protected]; Twitter: @JohnPeterJerrim.Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Proponents argue that grammar schools enhance social mobility by allowing high-attaining pupils to attend elite schools, no matter what their social background. However, disadvantaged pupils cannot benefit from grammar schools unless they gain access to them. In this article, we use rich cohort data to investigate the strength of, and reasons for, the socio-economic gradient in grammar school entrance rates. Presenting new evidence for England and Northern Ireland, we find stark differences in grammar school attendance by family income. Although differences in prior academic attainment can partly explain these gaps, parental school preferences and private tuition also play an important role. Entrance to grammar school therefore depends on birth and wealth, as well as academic attainment.
Supporting Information
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| berj3502-sup-0001-AppendixS1.docxWord document, 11.9 KB | Appendix S1. Supporting information |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Allen, R. (2016) Grammar schools contaminate comprehensive schooling areas. Available online at: https://educationdatalab.org.uk/2016/08/grammar-schools-contaminate-comprehensive-schooling-areas/ (accessed 1 June 2018).
- Andrews, J., Hutchinson, J. & Johnes, R. (2016) Grammar schools and social mobility (London, Education Policy Institute).
- Ball, S. J. & Vincent, C. (1998) ‘I Heard It on the Grapevine': ‘Hot' knowledge and school choice, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377–400.
- Ball, S. J., Bowe, R. & Gewirtz, S. (1996) School choice, social class and distinction: The realization of social advantage in education, Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 89–112.
10.1080/0268093960110105 Google Scholar
- Blanden, J., Gregg, P. & Macmillan, L. (2013) Intergenerational persistence in income and social class: The effect of within-group inequality, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 176(2), 541–563.
- Burgess, S., Dickson, M. & Macmillan, L. (2014) Do selective schooling systems increase inequality? DQSS Working Paper 14/09, UCL Institute of Education.
- Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A. & Wilson, D. (2015) What parents want: School preferences and school choice, The Economic Journal, 125(587), 1262–1289.
- Burgess, S., Crawford, C. & Macmillan, L. (2017) Assessing the role of grammar schools in promoting social mobility. DQSS Working Paper 17/09, UCL Institute of Education.
- Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Taylor, B. & Travers, M. C. (2017) Exploring the relative lack of impact of research on ‘ability grouping' in England: A discourse analytic account, Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 1–17.
- Gazeley, L. & Dunne, M. (2007) Researching class in the classroom: Addressing the social class attainment gap in initial teacher education, Journal of Education for Teaching, 33(4), 409–424.
10.1080/02607470701603209 Google Scholar
- Gewirtz, S., Ball, S. J. & Bowe, R. (1994) Parents, privilege and the education market-place, Research Papers in Education, 9(1), 3–29.
10.1080/0267152940090102 Google Scholar
- Gibbons, S. & Machin, S. (2008) Valuing school quality, better transport, and lower crime: Evidence from house prices, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(1), 99–119.
- Gorard, S. (2015) The uncertain future of comprehensive schooling in England, European Educational Research Journal, 14(3), 257–268.
- Hansen, K. (2014) Millennium Cohort Study. A guide to the datasets (London, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education). Available online at: www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/page.aspx?&sitesectionid=957&sitesectiontitle=Surveys+and+documentation (accessed 2 November 2017).
- Hanushek, E. & Woßmann, L. (2006) Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries, Economic Journal, 116(510), 63–76.
- Hastings, J. S., Kane, T. J. & Staiger, D. O. (2005) Parental preferences and school competition: Evidence from a public school choice program. NBER Working Paper No. w11805, National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Ireson, J. & Rushforth, K. (2011) Private tutoring at transition points in the English education system: Its nature, extent and purpose, Research Papers in Education, 26(1), 1–19.
- Jerrim, J. & Vignoles, A. (2013) Social mobility, regression to the mean and the cognitive development of high ability children from disadvantaged homes, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 176(4), 887–906.
- Ketende, S. & Jones, E. (2011) User guide to analysing MCS data using Stata (London, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education). Available online at: www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/library-media/documents/User%20Guide%20to%20Analysing%20MCS%20Data%20using%20Stata.pdf (accessed 7 June 2017).
- Mood, C. (2010) Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it, European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82.
- Norwood Report (1943) Curriculum and examinations in secondary schools (London, HMSO).
- Plewis, I. (2004) Millennium Cohort Study first survey: Technical report on sampling (London, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education). Available online at: file:///C:/Users/john/Downloads/MCS1_Technical_Report_on_Sampling_June_2004%20(3).pdf (accessed 16 June 2017).
- Reay, D. (2004) Exclusivity, exclusion, and social class in urban education markets in the United Kingdom, Urban education, 39(5), 537–560.
- Reay, D. & Ball, S. J. (1997) ‘Spoilt for choice': The working classes and educational markets, Oxford Review of Education, 23(1), 89–101.
- Reay, D. & Ball, S. J. (1998) ‘Making their minds up': Family dynamics of school choice, British Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 431–448.
10.1080/0141192980240405 Google Scholar
- Schoon, I. & Parsons, S. (2002) Teenage aspirations for future careers and occupational outcomes, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(2), 262–288.
- Secondary Education and Social Change (2018) Briefing paper: Grammar schools (Cambridge, University of Cambridge). Available online at: https://sesc.hist.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Briefing-paper-Grammar-Schools.pdf (accessed 6 September 2018).
- Smith-Woolley, E., Pingault, J. B., Selzam, S., Rimfeld, K., Krapohl, E., von Stumm, S. et al. (2018) Differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non-selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them, npj Science of Learning, 3(1), 3.
- Sutton Trust (2013) Poor grammar. Entry into grammar schools disadvantaged pupils in England. Available online at: www.suttontrust.com/researcharchive/poor-grammar-entry-grammar-schools-disadvantaged-pupils-england/ (accessed 6 June 2017).
- West, A. & Hind, A. (2003) Secondary school admissions in England: Exploring the extent of overt and covert selection (London, Rise Trust).
