Volume 53, Issue 6 p. 1750-1765
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The post-COVID-19 future of digital learning in higher education: Views from educators, students, and other professionals in six countries

Neil Guppy

Corresponding Author

Neil Guppy

Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Correspondence

Neil Guppy, Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, 6303 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Dominique Verpoorten

Dominique Verpoorten

Didactics and Teacher Training Unit, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
David Boud

David Boud

Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia

University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Middlesex University, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Lin Lin

Lin Lin

Department of Learning Technologies, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joanna Tai

Joanna Tai

Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Silvia Bartolic

Silvia Bartolic

Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 March 2022
Citations: 21

Funding information

Small internal research grants were used at a few institutions to cover in-house expenses. No external funding was received by any partner

Abstract

Predictions about the post-pandemic future of digital learning vary among higher education scholars. Some foresee dramatic, revolutionary change while others speculate that growth in educational technology will be buffeted both by modest expansion and unevenness. To this debate we contribute evidence from four groups across six countries on four continents: college and university educators (n = 281), students (n = 4243), senior administrators (n = 15), and instructional design specialists (n = 43). Our focus is on the future of digital learning after the pandemic-induced pivot to emergency remote instruction. Using data from interviews and self-administered questionnaires, our findings reveal a high degree of congruency between respondent groups, with most envisioning more blended/hybrid instruction post-pandemic and some modest increases in fully online courses. Student opinion is more sceptical about future change than within the other groups. Among respondents in all groups there is little expectation for a full-blown, revolutionary change in online or digital learning.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

  • Digital learning has been growing in higher education, although a digital disconnect continues whereby the availability of educational technology exceeds its application to learning.
  • Expectations regarding technology-mediated learning post-COVID-19 are mixed, hampering planning for the future.
  • Hesitancy about teaching or taking courses with some or full online components persists.

What this paper adds

  • A strong majority of respondents in higher education foresee the most growth in blended/hybrid forms of digital learning post-COVID-19.
  • A solid percentage, between about two-thirds and three-quarters of faculty and students, envision learners and instructors taking or teaching more fully online courses post-pandemic.
  • A strong congruency exists between faculty, students, senior administrators, and instructional design professionals in their ranking of scenarios for the future of digital learning.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Educational technology in higher learning will not return to a pre-COVID-19 normality—if a pre-COVID-19 ‘normal’ could even be defined.
  • As post-pandemic institutional planning unfolds, it is important to reflect experiences and incorporate insights of instructors, students, and instructional designers.
  • Successfully building on these insights, where more blended/hybrid learning is foreseen, requires a thoughtful integration of face-to-face learning and educational technology.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No conflicts of interest or commitment were reported by any author.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data are restricted by data sharing agreements signed by all of the partner institutions. Customised public files could be created, and made available, by contacting the corresponding author.