ICT-supported learning for inclusion of people with special needs: Review of seven educational technology journals, 1970–2011
Andreja Istenic Starcic
Search for more papers by this authorSpela Bagon
Search for more papers by this authorAndreja Istenic Starcic
Search for more papers by this authorSpela Bagon
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Research and development of information and communication technology (ICT)-supported learning for people with disabilities has not received adequate attention. It is also difficult to access research findings and developments in this field. Under the ENABLE Network of ICT Supported Learning for Disabled People (2011–2014) project, an emerging European Union reference point portal for end-users will provide this information for a broad audience. In the design phase of the project idea, the authors of this paper conducted a review of papers indexed in Web of Science to provide a needs assessment and a design template for the project objectives. The results of the search clearly showed that ICT-supported learning for people with special educational needs is in the domain of the educational technology journals, with more papers published in the British Journal of Educational Technology than in any other journal. This paper presents the results of a content analysis of all papers published from 1970 to 2011 in seven educational technology journals indexed in Web of Science. More papers were published from 2006 to 2011 (44.7%) than during any other of five periods examined. Findings in terms of ICT intervention, disability groups, groups of study participants by relationship with ICT, and research design, together with trends in published studies in terms of mainstreaming and inclusion, are presented. The main objective of the study was to identify the level of inclusion through analysis of educational context (special schools [30.51%], mainstream schools [28.81%] and general support for life [40.68%]). Based on content analysis, ICT interventions were classified into the two categories of technical intervention in the pedagogical context (62.71% of all papers published) and technical intervention in the wider context (37.29% of all papers published), with nine paper types identified: papers on ICT access, papers on teaching and learning methods, papers on development and testing of ICT solutions, reviews, assessments, papers on inclusion, papers on behavioural and social development, papers on use of information technology and papers on interaction. Papers were also categorised according to types of disability and according to groups of study participants by relationship with ICT. Published papers were divided into four categories by research design: descriptive (49.15%), developmental (26.27%), experimental (17.8%), and developmental and experimental (6.78%). During the period from 1970 to 2000, papers examined design of learning materials with regard to particular categories of disability and particular accessibility needs, while papers published after 2000 also discussed universal design.
Based on the review, the authors of this paper have identified a need for application of universal design principles in research and development of learning environments to provide equal accessibility and inclusive education.
References
- Abbott, C. & Cribb, A. (2001). Special schools, inclusion and the World Wide Web—the emerging research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 3, 3, 331–342.
- Adamo-Villani, N. & Beni, G. (2004). Automated finger spelling by highly realistic 3D animation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 3, 345–362.
- Adler, D. L. (1994). Getting clean with Herkimer: a software package for teaching children in special education to classify common objects. Computers & Education, 23, 3, 227–235.
- Ager, A. & Aalykke, S. (2001). TACS: a microcomputer support system for persons with cognitive disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 3, 373–377.
- Ari, I. A. & Inan, F. A. (2010). Assistive technologies for students with disabilities: a survey of access and use in Turkish Universities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 2, 40–45.
- Aspinall, A. & Hegarty, J. R. (2001). ICT for adults with learning disabilities: an organisation-wide audit. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 3, 365–372.
-
Bailey, J. & Weippert, H. (1992). Using computers to improve the language competence and attending behaviour of deaf Aboriginal children. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 8, 2, 118–127.
10.1111/j.1365-2729.1992.tb00395.x Google Scholar
- Bain, A. & Parkes, R. J. (2006). Curriculum authoring tools and inclusive classroom teaching practice: a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 2, 177–189.
- Beacham, N. A. & Alty, J. L. (2006). An investigation into the effects that digital media can have on the learning outcomes of individuals who have dyslexia. Computers & Education, 47, 1, 74–93.
- Beale, I. L. (2005). Scaffolding and integrated assessment in computer assisted learning (CAL) for children with learning disabilities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 2, 173–191.
- Bishop, J. (2003). The Internet for educating individuals with social impairments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 546–556.
- Bloor, C., Curran, D. A. S., Fowler, J., Manktelow, K., Middleton, W. & Moscardini, A. O. (1992). A hypertext system for teaching employment-related language to hearing-impaired school leavers. Computers & Education, 18, 1–3, 201–207.
- Bottge, B. A., Rueda, E., Kwon, J. M., Grant, T. & LaRoque, P. (2009). Assessing and tracking students' problem solving performances in anchored learning environments. Education Technology Research Development, 57, 529–552.
- Brebner, A., Clark, L. M. & Johnson, K. (1984). Vocational training for developmentally handicapped adults using CAI. Computers & Education, 8, 4, 445–448.
- Brown, D. J., McHugh, D., Standen, P., Evett, L., Shopland, N. & Battersby, S. (2011). Designing location-based learning experiences for people with intellectual disabilities and additional sensory impairments. Computers & Education, 56, 1, 11–20.
- Brown, I. C. (1987). Special keyboards for special needs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 3, 1, 67–74.
- Chambers, P. (1997). IV and SEN: using interactive video with special education needs pupils. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 1, 31–39.
- Chen, M., Wu, T., Lin, Y., Tasi, Y. & Chen, H. (2009). The effect of different representations on reading digital text for students with cognitive disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 4, 764–770.
- Cheng, Y., Chiang, H., Ye, J. & Cheng, L. (2010). Enhancing empathy instruction using a collaborative virtual learning environment for children with autistic spectrum conditions. Computers & Education, 55, 4, 1449–1458.
- Cheng, Y. & Ye, J. (2010). Exploring the social competence of students with autism spectrum conditions in a collaborative virtual learning environment—the pilot study. Computers & Education, 54, 4, 1068–1077.
- Cifuentes, L., Sharp, A., Bulu, S., Benz, M. & Stough, L. M. (2010). Developing a Web 2.0-based system with user-authored content for community use and teacher education. Education Technology Research Development, 58, 377–398.
- Conole, G. & Oliver, M. (2007). Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods, and impacts on practice. London: Routledge.
- Conti-Ramsden, G., Durkin, K. & Walker, A. J. (2010). Computer anxiety: a comparison of adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Computers & Education, 54, 1, 136–145.
-
Davis, P. & Florian, L. (2004). Searching the literature on teaching strategies and approaches for pupils with special educational needs: knowledge production and synthesis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 4, 3, 142–147.
10.1111/j.1471-3802.2004.00029.x Google Scholar
- Dimitriadi, Y. (2001). Evaluating the use of multimedia authoring with dyslexic learners: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 3, 265–275.
- Dinçyürek, S., Arsan, N. & Cağlar, M. (2011). The orthopedically handicapped and computer usage: the case of TRNC. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 1, 209–215.
- Ditcharoen, N., Naruedomkul, K. & Cercone, N. (2010). SignMT: an alternative language learning tool. Computers & Education, 55, 1, 118–130.
- Douglas, G. (2001). ICT, education, and visual impairment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 3, 353–364.
- Doyle, T. & Arnedillo-Sánchez, I. (2011). Using multimedia to reveal the hidden code of everyday behaviour to children with autistic spectrum disorders (ASDs). Computers & Education, 56, 2, 357–369.
- Durkin, K., Conti-Ramsden, G. & Walker, A. J. (2011). Txt lang: texting, textism use and literacy abilities in adolescents with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 49–57.
- Eden, S. & Heiman, T. (2011). Computer mediated communication: social support for students with and without learning disabilities. Educational Technology & Society, 14, 2, 89–97.
- European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (2010). Special needs educational. country data. Retrieved December 17, 2011, from http://www.european-agency.org/publications/ereports/special-needs-education-country-data-2010/SNE-Country-Data-2010.pdf
-
Fawcett, A. J., Nicolson, R. I. & Morris, S. (1993). Computer-based spelling remediation for dyslexic children. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9, 3, 171–183.
10.1111/j.1365-2729.1993.tb00103.x Google Scholar
- Fetton, E. A. & Blenkhorn, P. (1986). Computer assisted communication in the education of the visually impaired. Computers & Education, 10, 29–33.
- Fichten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J. V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M. N. et al (2009). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: an exploratory study. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 4, 241–256.
-
Florian, L. (2003). Editorial. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 3, 3, 139–140.
10.1111/1471-3802.00007 Google Scholar
- Freire, A. P., Linhalis, F., Bianchini, S. L., Fortes, R. P. M., Pimentel, M. da G. C. (2010). Revealing the whiteboard to blind students: an inclusive approach to provide mediation in synchronous e-learning activities. Computers & Education, 54, 4, 866–876.
- Furniss, F., Lancioni, G., Rocha, N., Cunha, B., Seedhouse, P., Morato, P. et al (2001). VICAID: development and evaluation of a palm-top-based job aid for workers with severe developmental disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 3, 277–287.
- Gabrielli, S., Mirabella, V., Kimani, S. & Catarci, T. (2006). A boosting approach to econtent development for learners with special needs. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 4, 17–26.
- García, A. M. D. & Cuello, R. O. (2010). A model of equitable and sustainable redistribution of knowledge. Education Technology Research Development, 58, 781–790.
- Germann, C., Broida, J. K. & Broida, J. M. (2003). Using computer-based virtual tours to assist persons with disabilities. Educational Technology & Society, 6, 3, 53–60.
- Gregor, P., Dickinson, A., Macaffer, A. & Andreasen, P. (2003). SeeWord—a personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 3, 341–355.
- Guat, T. B. & Teh, G. P. L. (1987). The effectiveness of using instructional objectives with less able secondary school pupils. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 3, 2, 135–144.
- Habib, M. (1988). A reading system for the blind based on geometrical shapes. Computers & Education, 12, 2, 311–320.
- Hartley, J. (1994). Designing instructional text for older readers: a literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 3, 172–188.
- Hartley, J. (2007). Teaching, learning and new technology: a review for teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 1, 42–62.
- Hegarty, J., Bostock, S. & Collins, D. (2000). Staff development in information technology for special needs: a new distance-learning course at Keele University. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 3, 199–212.
- Hertzog, M., Stinson, M. S. & Keiffer, R. (1989). Effects of caption modification and instructor intervention on comprehension of a technical film. Educational Technology Research & Development, 37, 2, 59–68.
- Houghton, S., Milner, N., West, J., Douglas, G., Lawrence, V., Whiting, K. et al (2004). Motor control and sequencing of boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during computer game play. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 1, 21–34.
- Hsu, Y. C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C. C., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Wang, C. Y. et al (2012). Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009: a content analysis of publications in selected journals. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 2, 354–370.
- Iorio, A. D., Feliziani, A. A., Mirri, S., Salomoni, P. & Vitali, F. (2006). Automatically producing accessible learning objects. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 4, 3–16.
- Istenic Starcic, A. (2010). Educational technology for the inclusive classroom. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 3, 26–37.
- Istenic Starcic, A., Cotic, M. & Zajc, M. (2013). Design-based research on the use of a tangible user interface for geometry teaching in an inclusive classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 5, 729–744. [Correction added on 13 September 2013, after first online publication: The publication year and issue details for this reference have been corrected.]
- Istenic Starcic, A. & Niskala, M. (2010). Vocational students with severe learning difficulties learning on the Internet. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 6, 155–159.
- James, V. & Hammersley, M. (1993). Notebook computers as note-takers for handicapped students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 1, 63–66.
- Johnson, R. & Hegarty, J. R. (2003). Websites as educational motivators for adults with learning disability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 4, 479–486.
- D. H. Jonassen (Ed.) (1996). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology ( 2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Jones, A. (1996). The use of computers to support learning in children with emotional and behavioural difficulties. Computers Education, 26, 1–3, 81–90.
- Kang, H. W. & Zentall, S. S. (2011). Computer-generated geometry instruction: a preliminary study. Education Technology Research Development, 59, 783–797.
- Kavkler, M. (2007). Ali je šola dovolj dobra za otroke s posebnimi potrebami? Uresničevanje inkluzije v šolski praksi. Šolsko Polje, 44, 3, 77–94.
- Kleemans, T., Segers, E., Droop, M. & Wentink, H. (2010). WebQuests in special primary education: learning in a Web-based environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 5, 801–810.
- Kolenc, J. & Lebarič, N. (2007). Toward inclusive treatment of children with special needs. Šolsko Polje, 3/4, 95–108.
-
Koler Povh, T., Južnič, P., Turk, Ž. & Turk, G. (2011). Analysis of scientific publications in civil and geodetic engineering in Slovenia, in the case of the Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering in University of Ljubljana. Geodetski Vestnik, 55, 4, 764–780.
10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2011.04.764-780 Google Scholar
- Konur, O. (2007). Computer-assisted teaching and assessment of disabled students in higher education: the interface between academic standards and disability rights. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 3, 207–219.
- Kunpfer, N. & McLellan, H. (1996). Descriptive research methodologies. In H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology ( 2nd ed.) (pp 1196–1212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
- Kurhila, J. & Laine, T. (2000). Individualized special education with cognitive skill assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 2, 163–170.
- Law, A. G., Maguire, R. B., Sabo, D. F. G. & Shuparski, B. M. (1984). Computer voice support for visually-handicapped students. Computers & Education, 8, 1, 35–39.
- Lewis, L., Trushell, J. & Woods, P. (2005). Effects of ICT group work on interactions and social acceptance of a primary pupil with Asperger's syndrome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 5, 739–755.
- Lewis, N. & Neill, S. (2001). Portable computers for teachers and support services working with pupils with special educational needs: an evaluation of the 1999 United Kingdom Department for Education and Employment scheme. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 3, 301–315.
- Lin, H. (2007). The ethics of instructional technology: issues and coping strategies experienced by professional technologists in design and training situations in higher education. Education Technology Research Development, 55, 411–437.
- Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. London: Sage.
- Lindsay, G. (2007). Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 1–24.
- Ling, B., Allison, C., Nicholl, J. R., Moodley, L. & Roberts, D. (2006). Disabilities Information Flow: a disabilities information management system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 2, 289–294.
- Liu, C. & Hong, Y. (2007). Providing hearing-impaired students with learning care after classes through smart phones and the GPRS network. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 4, 727–741.
- Luke, R. (2002). AccessAbility: enabling technology for lifelong learning inclusion in an electronic classroom—2000. Educational Technology & Society, 5, 1, 148–153.
- MacCann, A. (1996). Designing accessible learning materials for learners with disabilities and learning difficulties. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 2, 109–120.
-
MacKenzie, N., Jones, H. C. & Payne, T. (1970). Audio-visual resources in Sussex schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 1, 16–34.
10.1111/j.1467-8535.1970.tb00514.x Google Scholar
- Magnan, A. & Ecalle, J. (2006). Audio-visual training in children with reading disabilities. Computers & Education, 46, 4, 407–425.
- Mavrou, K., Lewis, A. & Douglas, G. (2010). Researching computer-based collaborative learning in inclusive classrooms in Cyprus: the role of the computer in pupils' interaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 3, 486–501.
- McEvoy, J. & McConkey, R. (1991). Self-instructional videocourses: a cost-effective approach to in-service training of teachers in special education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 3, 164–173.
- Merrell, C. & Tymms, P. (2007). Identifying reading problems with computer-adaptive assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 27–35.
- Mintz, J., Branch, C., March, C. & Lerman, S. (2012). Key factors mediating the use of a mobile technology tool designed to develop social and life skills in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Computers & Education, 58, 53–62.
- Mioduser, D., Tur-Kaspa, H. & Leitner, I. (2000). The learning value of computer-based instruction of early reading skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 54–63.
- Montero, F., López-Jaquero, V., Navarro, E. & Sánchez, E. (2011). Computer-aided relearning activity patterns for people with acquired brain injury. Computers & Education, 57, 1149–1159.
- Neilson, D. P., Pickering, J. A. & Vella, C. A. (1989). Technology and special needs: a survey of current UK research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 20, 1, 57–60.
- Nevile, L. & Treviranus, J. (2010). Interoperability for individual learner centred accessibility for Web-based educational systems. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 4, 215–227.
- Newell, A. F., Booth, L. & Beattie, W. (1991). Predictive text entry with PAL and children with learning difficulties. British Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 1, 23–40.
- Nicol, M. M. & Anderson, A. (2000). Computer-assisted vs. teacher-directed teaching of numeracy in adults. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 184–192.
- Nicolson, R. N., Pickering, S. & Fawcett, A. J. (1991). A HyperCard TM spelling support environment for dyslexic children. Computers & Education, 16, 2, 203–209.
- Norwich, B. (2008). Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Ohene-Djan, J., Zimmer, R., Gorle, M. & Naqvi, S. (2003). A personalisable electronic book for video-based sign language education. Educational Technology & Society, 6, 4, 86–99.
- Opara, B. (2007). From apprehending to the inclusiveness paradigm. Šolsko Polje, 18, 3–4, 35–61.
- Opara, B. (2009). Children with special needs in schools and kindergartens. The role and function of kindergartens and schools in the education of children with special needs. Ljubljana: Centerkontura.
- Ortega-Tudela, J. M. & Gómez-Ariza, C. J. (2006). Computer-assisted teaching and mathematical learning in Down Syndrome children. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 298–307.
- Ozdemir, S. (2008). Using multimedia social stories to increase appropriate social engagement in young children with autism. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7, 3, 80–88.
- Parsons, S., Daniels, H., Porter, J. & Robertson, C. (2006a). The use of ICT by adults with learning disabilities in day and residential services. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 1, 31–44.
- Parsons, S., Leonard, A. & Mitchell, P. (2006b). Virtual environments for social skills training: comments from two adolescents with autistic spectrum disorder. Computers & Education, 47, 2, 186–206.
- Peltenburg, M., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. & Doig, B. (2009). Mathematical power of special-needs pupils: an ICT-based dynamic assessment format to reveal weak pupils' learning potential. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 2, 273–284.
- Rajendran, G. & Mitchell, P. (2000). Computer mediated interaction in Asperger's syndrome: the Bubble Dialogue program. Computers & Education, 35, 3, 189–207.
-
Ralph, S. (2006). Editorial. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 6, 1, 1–2.
10.1111/j.1471-3802.2006.00053.x Google Scholar
- Reis, M. G. A. D., Cabral, L., Peres, E., Bessa, M., Valente, A., Morais, R. et al (2010). Using information technology based exercises in primary mathematics teaching of children with cerebral palsy and mental retardation: a case study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 3, 106–118.
- Richey, R. & Nelson, W. (1996). Development research. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology ( 2nd ed.) (pp 1213–1245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Strasser, K. & Csaszar, F. (1997). Computer assisted mediation for blind children. Computer & Education, 28, 4, 229–235.
- Ross, S. & Morrison, G. (1996). Experimental research methods. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp 1170–1213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Rostron, A., Plant, R. & Hermann, C. (1994). Hypermedia for the learning disabled: expensive luxury or useful tool? Computers & Education, 22, 3, 215–223.
-
Runswick-Cole, K. (2011). Time to end the bias towards inclusive education? British Journal of Special Education, 38, 3, 112–119.
10.1111/j.1467-8578.2011.00514.x Google Scholar
- Sahin, Y. G. & Cimen, F. M. (2011). An interactive attention board: improving the attention of individuals with autism and mental retardation. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 1, 24–35.
- Sánchez, J. & Sáenz, M. (2010). Metro navigation for the blind. Computers & Education, 55, 970–981.
- Schery, T. & O'Connor, L. (1997). Language intervention: computer training for young children with special needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 4, 271–279.
- Schloss, P. J. (1986). Sequence of direct instructional activities for handicapped learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 17, 10–17.
- Seale, J. & Cooper, N. (2010). E-learning and accessibility: an exploration of the potential role of generic pedagogical tools. Computers & Education, 54, 1107–1116.
- Seale, J. K. (2001). The same but different: the use of the personal home page by adults with Down syndrome as a tool for self-presentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 3, 343–352.
- Selda, O. (2008). Using multimedia social stories to increase appropriate social engagement in young children with autism. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7, 3, 80–88.
- Seo, Y. & Bryant, D. P. (2009). Analysis of studies of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 53, 3, 913–928.
- Seo, Y. & Woo, H. (2010). The identification, implementation, and evaluation of critical user interface design features of computer-assisted instruction programs in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 55, 1, 363–377.
- Sepehr, H. & Harris, D. (1995). Teachers' use of software for pupils with specific learning difficulties. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 11, 2, 64–71.
- Shamir, A. & Shlafer, I. (2011). E-books effectiveness in promoting phonological awareness and concept about print: a comparison between children at risk for learning disabilities and typically developing kindergarteners. Computers & Education, 57, 1989–1997.
- Sheehy, K. (2005). Morphing images: a potential tool for teaching word recognition to children with severe learning difficulties. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 2, 293–301.
- Shih, M., Feng, J. & Tsai, T. (2008). Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: a content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals. Computers & Education, 51, 2, 955–967.
-
Silver, P., Bourke, A. & Strehorn, K. C. (1998). Universal instructional design in higher education: an approach for inclusion. Equity & Excellence in Education, 31, 2, 47–51.
10.1080/1066568980310206 Google Scholar
- Singleton, C. & Simmons, F. (2001). An evaluation of Wordshark in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 3, 317–330.
- Snell, R. C., Dickson, B. C. & Ingram, J. C. L. (1984). Visible speech for the hearing impaired. Computers & Education, 8, 4, 441–444.
- Standen, P. J., Camm, C., Battersby, S., Brown, D. J. & Harrison, M. (2011). An evaluation of the Wii Nunchuk as an alternative assistive device for people with intellectual and physical disabilities using switch controlled software. Computers & Education, 56, 1, 2–10.
- Straker, N. (1988). Interactive video: a cost-effective model for mathematics and science classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 3, 202–210.
- Tan, T. S. & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Effects of computer collaborative group work on peer acceptance of a junior pupil with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Computers & Education, 50, 3, 725–741.
- Thorne, M. (1987). The legacy of the Microelectronics Education Programme. British Journal of Educational Technology, 3, 18, 165–181.
- Valenti, S., Fioretti, S., Maurizi, M., Panti, M. & Leo, T. (2002). Teaching motor disability assessment over the Web: MODASPECTRA. Educational Technology & Society, 5, 1, 184–198.
- Vincent, T. (1982). Computer assisted support for blind students: the use of a microcomputer linked voice synthesizer. Computers & Education, 6, 1, 55–60.
- Walker, J. & Rostron, A. (1999). CAL and acoustic environments for deaf children. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 85–90.
-
Ward, R., Lindley, P., Rostron, A., Sewell, D. & Cubie, R. (1985). An evaluation of the Language and Thought software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1, 2, 66–72.
10.1111/j.1365-2729.1985.tb00013.x Google Scholar
- Wearmouth, J., Smith, A. P. & Soler, J. (2004). Computer conferencing with access to a “guest expert” in the professional development of special educational needs coordinators. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 1, 81–93.
- Wilding, J. M. (1999). Use of IT with learning-disabled population: problems and challenges. Educational Technology & Society, 2, 4, 130–133.
- Williams, P., Hamid, R., Jamali, R. & Nicholas, D. (2006). Using ICT with people with special education needs: what the literature tells us. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 58, 4, 330–345.
- Winter, E. C. & McGhie-Richmond, D. (2005). Using computer conferencing and case studies to enable collaboration between expert and novice teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 2, 118–129.
- Wisdom, J. P., White, N., Goldsmith, K., Bielavitz, S., Rees, A. & Davis, C. (2007). Systems limitations hamper integration of accessible information technology in Northwest US K-12 schools. Educational Technology & Society, 10, 3, 222–232.
- Witt, N. & McDermott, A. (2004). Web site accessibility: what logo will we use today? British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 1, 45–56.
- Wood, D. L. (1986). Designing microcomputer programs for disabled students. Computers & Education, 10, 1, 35–42.
- Woodfine, B. P., Baptista Nunes, M. & Wright, D. J. (2008). Text-based synchronous e-learning and dyslexia: not necessarily the perfect match! Computers & Education, 50, 3, 703–717.
- Wright, A. & Anderson, M. (1987). Does a computer system help to teach a sight vocabulary to children with severe learning difficulties? British Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 18, 52–60.
- Wright, A., Read, P. & Anderson, M. (1992). Contrasting computer input devices for teaching children with severe learning difficulties to read. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 2, 106–112.
- Yang, H. & Lay, Y. (2005). Implementation and evaluation of computer-aided Mandarin phonemes training system for hearing-impaired students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 3, 537–551.
- Yang, H. Y., Lay, Y.-L., Liou, Y.-C., Tsao, W.-T. & Lin, C.-K. (2007). Development and evaluation of computer-aided music-learning system for the hearing impaired. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 466–476.